ZEAD great circles connecting USS San Francisco fake crash location to 2004 Tsunami, MH370 & other mega disasters.

editor's note. update 21 Dec 2016:

We received these amazing series of ZEAD (Zionist Evil Axes of Disasters) lines that seem to connect the major disaster locations, WNC (Weaponised Natural Calamities) to M2HAF (Made-2-Happen-Accidents-False flags) like the 20041226 Asian Tsunami to the falsified USS San Francisco nuclear submarine mishap and the more recent MAS MH370-MH17 and AirAsia QZ8501 airline crashes. Even the pretentious MH370 search locations fall into place.  

The ZEAD compilation Updates





Editor: Repost on the 11th anniversary of the 2004 Tsunami. USS San Francisco was involved in the black ops 2004 Tsunami, offshore Sumatra (by BK Lim 2011). Worth reading to unravel the truth of other ZM2H disasters like the Malaysian MH370 and the Australian Montara Oil Spill disasters.

BK Lim's findings were made prior to the compilation of the ZEAD great circles in 2014. More to come from several analyses made by several other writers. This serves as a preliminary introduction.

Look at the ZEAD (great circles) lines connecting all these disasters. While it is understandable for significant cities like Singapore (5), Kobe (2) and Beijing (1) to be apexes  of the Asian Pentagram of Destruction  (APD), the remaining 3 apex location were unknown and remote until after the mega quake-disasters had struck.

Apex 6 was the location of the great 2008 Sichuan quake (and many smaller quakes).

Apex 4 was the location of the M6.5 quake at 1010z on the eve of the 51st anniversary (2014) of JFK Assassination in 1963. It is significant to note that another quake (M5.9) occurred at Apex 6 at on the anniversary day at 08:55z (UTC=0). This was followed by another quake (M6.2) 4 hours later at Apex 2, the locations of the 1995 Great Kobe quake (M6.8) and the 311 quake (M9.1) of 2011 which caused the Fukushima Nuclear tragedy.

Forming perfect equilateral triangles, Apex 3 boasts of no fame or fortune except that it was the location of the infamous (false) "crash grounding of the nuclear submarine USS San Francisco". Looking at the false (fabricated / invented) crash, search areas or sighted MH370 debris, it is very clear the grounding location of the USS San Francisco had been fabricated as well.

Coincidence is often the only alibi to explain the perfect timing or alignment of events and places in an otherwise "impossible to explain" circumstances in a scheming plot.
 

Bush-Era Admin lied about the USS San Francisco accident to distance its covert involvement with the 26 Dec 2004 9.3 quake offshore Sumatra.

written by BK Lim 20 Sept 2011 (reposted without any edition). 

http://bklim.newsvine.com/_news/2011/09/24/7939507-bush-era-admin-lied-about-the-uss-san-francisco-accident-to-distance-its-covert-involvement-with-the-26-dec-2004-93-quake-offshore-sumatra





“According to official reports, the USS San Francisco was involved in a high speed collision with an unexpected undersea terrain in the Caroline ridge area, 350 miles SE of her Guam base on 8 Jan 2005”.

How could the world's most advanced and sophisticated navy commit such a terribly naive mistake of crashing into an uncharted sea mount? What was even more incredible is the fact that the multi-billion nuclear submarine was equipped with the state-of-the-art navigation, positioning and sonar detection systems, manned by an experienced crew and commanded by Cmdr. Kevin Mooney, a naval captain with 19 years of exemplary service. A rookie crew first time at sea and a commander out of the comedy movie “police academy” perhaps. But a submarine which had successfully completed all its previous missions with flying colours? They must really be scrapping the bottom of the barrel to come up with stories like that.

We see that from NOAA, MMS, Coast Guards and BP's top management in BP's Mega Oil spill disaster and in 911, Pentagon, Bush-Dick Administration and the CIA. Different actors, different stage plays but same agenda, same tactics and same skullduggery.

Granted that the navy would fabricate lies to cover their criminal acts and ill-intentions, all under the pretext of national security, but why would highly qualified naval experts deviously provide technical data and analyses to support an unsupportable lie. Of all people, they should know that such a fictitious accident could never happen. Because they could get away with such lies and crime of mass destruction, the Gulf Mega Oil spill was repeated 6 years later. 911 was similarly an insider job, by the same group of Neocon Nazis who had been commanding the US administration for the last 30 years.

With each successful disaster (fatal to the rest of the world), they get bolder and bolder. It is thus not surprising insurance claims for environmental disasters in the first half of 2011 had already exceeded the claims for the whole year of 2010. Where is the moral decency of honesty and integrity? Why do Americans and the rest of the world allow themselves to be duped so badly?

Some comments that do not jive with commonsense.

A vessel's commander is typically held responsible for mishaps of this nature, but officials had suggested that Mooney might escape blame if the investigation found that the mountain was not on the charts and the skipper had exercised sound judgment.

"Although the grounding incident compelled me to punish (him) and remove him from command, in my opinion it does not negate 19 years of exemplary service," the admiral wrote. "Prior to the grounding incident, USS San Francisco demonstrated a trend of continuing improvement and compiled an impressive record of achievement under (Mooney's) leadership. Moreover, the crew's post-grounding response under his direct leadership was commendable and enabled (the sub's) recovery and safe return to port."

The San Francisco had finished all the post-refueling sea trials and conducted its first two-month deployment last year, arriving back in Guam Dec. 1, 2004. On Friday, Jan. 7, it set sail for Brisbane, Australia, for a port visit. The sailors were probably excited — Australians still recall that the U.S. submarine force kept the Japanese at bay in the Pacific during World War II and generally treat American submariners well.

Could the “grounding and high speed head-on collision” involving the USS San Francisco be another stage play like the 2Aug 1964 Gulf of Tonkin (USS Maddox Incident) incident which gave President Lyndon Johnson the excuse to escalate the Vietnam war; to bomb Vietnam back to the “stone ages”? Forty years after the Nam War, many will agree it was another senseless war with sinister selfish agenda. A war which the majority of Americans rejected. A war in which many fighting American soldiers frequently asked; “what the hell are we fighting for?” A war which killed more than 58,000 American soldiers and plunged a prosperous United State into the inevitable path of economic decline and collapse. Was it worth it?

Forty years later, a once great and respected nation, is in an economic quagmire of its own doing. The enemy from within especially at the seats of power, is definitely more potent than any outside enemy. Were the financial turmoils and economic upheavals due to a Few BAD Men with their propensity to lie their way to the top of the Pyramid of Power and to suppress truth at all costs? Hitler also wanted to rule the world through deceit and falsehood. This is one more missing dot to the real conspiracy of depopulating the world and controlling freedom by a Few BAD Men; who all appear to be “honourable, respectable and benovalent” (only) in public. And we often wondered why the world was in such a mess?

 Tsunami by Quake? Bomb? Comet? EM?

 The following is a compilation of information that may or may not be directly related to Dec. 26, 2004 Quake. If the9.0 quake was man-made, it was the biggest war crime in our history and needs to be looked at thoroughly. I would like to assume it was a natural diseaster and that our government nor any other government had a hand in it. After the 911 attack most americans believed the government when they said it was Bin Laden terrorists that organized and implimented the attack. Now, over 50 percent of US people believe there was some kind of conspiracy or cover-up by our government, according to a recent poll. So lets take a look at this with a open mind and try to determine if it was a natural diseaster or a war crime by man.
Topic started on 12-1-2005 @ 09:12 PM by Ycon

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread111242/pg1

Did they underestimate the scale of destruction from an “untested” tsunami bomb? Did the USS San Francisco really run aground 350 miles south-east of Guam on 8 Jan 2005, 2 weeks after the 26 Dec quake or was the damage sustained much earlier, like on the same day of the quake?

Were the shoals in the Caroline ridge chosen because they were the only shallow zone in the wide deep Pacific ocean to fit the unexpected event? The “official story” never really explained how a sophisticated multi-billion submarine with the state-of-the-art navigation and positioning system could have strayed so many miles off-course from their intended leisure port call to Brisbane. From years of experience in investigating make-up stories to cover fraudulent activities, the tall story of the “grounding and head on collision that never was” has to take the cake. The typical technical inconsistencies and discrepancies of an “after-thought” fabrication to fit the events are all evident.

Making more lies to cover the initial lies will only lead to the exponential growth of lies before it all become unmanageable and the whole fraud collapses.

The “holes” will definitely show, sooner or later. Hence the necessity to eliminate those who would not keep quiet. Those who subserviently toe the line; were rewarded, promoted and decorated. In an evil empire, true heroes die and are discredited. False heroes lie and rise. History is full of such examples; Nazis Gestapo, Russian KGB and American CIA all used similar tactics.

There is much more but I will let professionals with conscience around the world, expose the rest. Being a newly awakened human being (20 April 2008 to be precise), the 26 Dec 2004 Sumatra Quake-Tsunami was outside my conscience radar screen. Like billions I was led to believe it was a natural disaster or at the most an accidental nuclear explosion. Definitely, not a disaster-by-design like the BP's Mega Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010.

Without the coordinated efforts and assistance of those who had worked hard in the background since 911, the falsehood of this fabricated story, would never see the light of day. Hopefully, this will inspire others to come forward to expose other frauds. Mega disasters cannot paradoxically coalesce from a well-timed sequence of coincidental accidents. Each accident leads to a small disaster of its own. Many accidents lead to many disasters. They do not climax into a mega disaster; only a well-timed sequence of preplanned “accidents” can.

When the “Tsunami-quake-caused-by-atomic-warhead-scientists-say” story first landed on my desk after the 5.8mag 23Aug 2011 shallow quake in Virginia, the article (last updated on 12/09/2008) was already 3 years old. No doubt speculations that the 11 March 2011 Fukushima quake-tsunami was triggered by design, also rekindled interests in the 2004 quake and the suspected involvement of the USS San Francisco nuclear submarine. The official bogus story was never really accepted by independent scientists but in the face of well-funded concerted cyber-media Blitzkrieg attacks by the bought international bodies and main stream media, legitimate dissenting voices, no matter how scientific or logical, were immediately drowned out.

Is it any surprise hundreds of uncompromising independent scientists and professionals with conscience had been taken out in the last decade? Just as the German people could not have been so hopelessly duped without the relentless hypnotizing propaganda of the Nazis, our world could not have been held ransom by the atrocious Neocon-Nazis Power (NNP) behind the “popularly-elected” US presidents for so long without the full support of the bought MSM, professionals and academia.

To prove that trolls were still on the prowl on this USS San Francisco story (7 years after the incident), the story was seeded on my newsvine column on 28 Aug 2011. Before exposing the truth, why not test out the trolls? Would the trolls come out to play? The said article was seeded on facebook as well by 3 bloggers including me. Will the “drones” attack all 3 bloggers or just me? Would they risk kicking up the dust on a storm that had quietened down? They would if they were 100% confident the lids on the “Pandora box” had been sealed so tight, the scums would not spill. But like all cover-ups, they forgot  the corrosive effect of “toxic lies”. There is no such thing as a water-tight cover-up. The truth leaks out sooner or later.

For the trolls who got it wrong, they would be meeting their angry paymasters shortly. Instead of stemming out the truth they had just rekindled a dead story back to life. By 12 Sept 2011, the seeded article in my newsvine column received 71 comments but a mere 11 votes in 2 weeks; an indication of the troll to followers ratio. We counted 9 trolls (or troll identities; with trolls you never know) altogether, who contributed the aggressive denials and fallacious arguments to the few discrepancies raised. They had thought it was a lapse of judgment to seed the article. They seized on the opportunity to trash, ridicule and destroy my credibility after failing on numerous past attempts. I had to refrain from answering for fear of spilling the beans. Perhaps later in another article. There are just too many important issues on my plate right now. My trusted circle of independent truth analysts, are warning me the next quake-tsunami mega disaster could be just around the corner targeting the world's largest creditor nations.

The same story seeded by Apprentice Novax Vinbeazel a few hours earlier in the Facebook, attracted no troll attack with less than 5 readers' comments. The same story seeded on 11 Sept on MKollmann's newsvine column similarly attracted no troll attack and no interest at all. It is thus clear they would not waste precious cyber-attack resources on unknown blogs but would spare no effort to discredit any gulf-truth activists who had consistently and persistently exposed BP's frauds and lies. As the USS San Francisco fraudulent story had long being buried and forgotten, it also means that BP was still edgy over the Mega Oil Spill disaster and unsure the “fire of truth” has been completely stemmed out. See BP's latest effort to hootwink the masses with a scientific NOAA survey

Their “long knives” were drawn less than 2 days on this “golden opportunity” to cyber-assassinate me after their numerous assassination attempts had failed in early 2011. A future article will detail out the loss of innocent lives in mistaken toxic poisoning, killing and shooting so coincidentally at locations where I had been. Amazing is it not?

The said article was seeded without the technical exposure, analysis and evidence first. We wanted them to eat their own words and lies. Well, the independent truth-seekers can also play their little game. No doubt, this article will attract condemnation, abuses, ridicule and aggressive denials by the trolls. It will just prove what many genuine truth bloggers had already suspected and experienced. The internet and world wide web were originally created with the hidden agenda of broadcasting to billions, the distorted truths and fallacious official stories to serve their masters' agenda decades before unleashing a series of disasters-by-design after the turn of the century. There must have been earlier disasters-by-design but it is outside the scope of present article.

Mother Nature and Truth have a way of fighting back. This incredible unearthing of this deceitful collision of the USS San Francisco on 8 Jan 2005” and the subsequent “kangaroo” investigation is one example. Sorry no pun intended but it is a fact that John Howard, the then PM of Australia had to know; to help cover up the biggest crime of mass-destruction of the century. 911 and 311 (Japan 9.0 quake on 11 March 2011) pale in comparison to the destruction of the 2004 mega quake-tsunami.

Many in the naval forces and marine industry had to know. Willful Silence is the name of the game. “See no Evil, Speak no Evil, and Hear no Evil” was the sound advice told to me countless times in my 30 years career. “Do not look for troubles lest troubles trouble you?”.. ..a favourite phrase from my school teacher. For generations we have all been taught to be subservient, to obey the laws and regulations and to pay the taxes. Yes we all did. But what happens when the top echelon of society or the Power Pyramid break those rules; deceive the public and worst of all commit mass murders or mass destruction? Are we still bound by laws and rules to remain in ranks and keep silence?

Well, I broke ranks when I exposed the frauds onboard Fugro's survey vessels. For 2 years I was set up by my immediate boss and employer (recently promoted to Director in RPS group) to be killed for refusing to keep quiet and close my eyes to the scandalous improprieties committed by Fugro. Was a BP's style mega oil spill preplanned to explode weeks before the great financial and economic crash of 2008? How could they claim to be innocent parties to a “natural mega oil spill” like BP did with their Macondo wells in the Gulf of Mexico; if I was still alive with the incriminating evidence.

They had to kill me first. But the more they tried, the more they revealed their evil schemes. Just like the trolls who rekindled the fictitious submarine collision, they had unwittingly rekindled curiosities into my assassination attempts. Why were they so determined to kill a geohazards specialist who had just exposed the contractor's negligence? I was dutifully carrying out my responsibility as a Client Rep QC and looking after ENI's interests. I was proud to have caught Fugro (geohazards contractor) red-handed when so many others before me had not. Strangely instead of commending me for a job well done; saving ENI from a potentially risky well and a disastrous blowout ENI kept silence. Never mind I have had more than my share of commendations. Instead I found myself a victim of assassination with my employer setting up the ambushes with false work assignments and pretext of looking after my welfare.

They had to take me out. My known residences were surrounded. The hired thugs kept 24/7 surveillance for more than 6 months keeping my whole family prisoners at our own home. In the end, I had to hire armed escorts (members of the special forces) to smuggle me out to freedom. But I had a bigger surprise. With all the photo and documented evidences, none of the governments I lodged complaints to, took any interest or action against the Oil Mafia. They remain silent. If I had lodged false complaints, they would have arrested me. So these reports must contain the truth, truths they cannot deny. Very eerily similar to the USS San Francisco fake collision on 8 Jan 2005.

As I wondered and reasoned that there had to be something more than a simple expose of Fugro's frauds, the answers came when BP's Macondo wells exploded. Did BP forgo the mandatory geohazards site survey for the Macondo wells because of ENI's experience with me in the Straits of Malacca exactly 2 years before BP's staged disaster? Like ENI, BP had planned their Macondo oil disaster for several years. They could not afford to have some independent geohazards specialists spoiled their plans. BP was fearful of outside interference in their carefully orchestrated stage play and NOT BECAUSE they could not afford to pay for a mandatory site survey. So how did BP get insurance coverage for their drilling risk? How did BP get permission from MMS to drill if the geohazards site survey for the Macondo wells was never conducted?

The planned gas blowout and oil spill disaster at the Straits of Malacca would be even more disastrous (economically) than the Gulf disaster. Looking at figure 164-0, the oil prices were much higher then. Bought analysts were predicting oil prices as high as USD 250 /barrel by the end of that year. Because the Straits of Malacca Oil spill disaster (2008 SOMOS) of mid August did not happen as planned and media hype alone without a real disaster could not keep the artificial oil prices high above actual demand, oil prices started to slide from their highs of >140 USD/ barrel in mid August. No wonder they had to kill me in early August to prevent the market crash on 16 Sept. Was it a coincidence ENI held back the proposed drilling of the well in mid 2008?

Instead of windfalls, the perpetrators of the 2008 SOMOS suffered huge loses. Imagine how much the oil mafia would have made if the oil price had shot from 140 to >200 USD/barrel after the planned disaster? Instead they were left holding hefty losses when the price collapsed from 140 to 30 USD/barrel (a completely reversed trend).

There was no question my expose of gross negligence and incompetence in Fugro's geohazards report upset their scam disaster plan. Fugro's geohazards assessment had already approved the proposed well location for safe drilling in mid 2008 before I intercepted on a chanced QC request for the report. Reminiscent of BP's Macondo Exploration drilling permit application, the high risk drilling hazards were completely omitted. The oil mafia could not risk being exposed for masterminding such a mega environmental disaster, not while I was still alive with the incriminating evidence.

A mega oil spill disaster in one of the world's busiest trade route (Malacca Straits) would have disrupted world trade and shot an already high oil price sky high. Imagine the oil slick covering the Straits of Malacca and flooding into Singapore, the world's busiest port. Crude oil price was at its peak of 144 USD/barrel on 8 July 2008. It dropped to a low of 39 USD/ barrel on 23 Dec 2008, a drop of more than 100 USD in less than 6 months. Read my coming posting; “BP's style gas blowout & mega oil spill disaster preplanned for mid 2008 offshore Sumatra, in the Straits of Malacca?”

who buys #ISIS stolen oil?

Who buys #ISIS's stolen oil? #Syria #Turkey https://t.co/xzfYuPKhJj

— IN THE NOW (@INTHENOWRT) November 24, 2015

Apollo Moon Mission - the world's greatest fraud that reaped trillion$ for the Cabal.

Ever wonder why we could not get back to the moon after 45 years? For starters, what we witnessed through the grainy Tell-Us-Lies_Vision were pre-recorded grade-B studio production videos which were fraudulently broadcast as live (lie) footage. Just like all the 911 lie (live) broadcasts on the morning of Sept 11, 2001. Here are the compilation of all the evidence (lies, astroliars, camera discrepancies, physical impossibilities and just pure fiction).

editor note: this is a continuous compilation. please return to check for updates.

Astronauts gone wild an investigation into the authenticity of the moon landings




(Video+Photo) This Is Why We Never Went Back To The Moon
Published on Friday, 15 May 2015 10:25




“I believe that this nation should commit itself, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the earth… no single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind or more important for the long range exploration of space.”

With his speech on May 25, 1961, President John F. Kennedy established the conquest of the Moon as a national goal.

The space program, through NASA, was to have far reaching effects, developing new technologies and forcing the nation’s schools to emphasize the teaching of science and mathematics. It was a dramatic cultural revolution that eventually brought us things like velcro, Star Trek and the internet.

But even before it started, our exploration of the Moon was destined to be short-lived. Despite all the promises and science fiction movies, humans would not build bases on the Moon, mine for minerals or use it as a stepping stone to other planets. In fact, the Moon would soon be forgotten and ignored by space research – why?

Carefully Scripted

The first Moon landing by humans was in 1969 when Apollo 11 took the “giant step for mankind.” The American taxpayers, who spent billions of dollars on the space program, were treated to televised interviews with the astronauts as they sped towards their landing site. Televisions were set up in classrooms and the world watched as this great event happened live before our eyes.

But years after the event, retired astronaut, Buzz Aldrin, revealed that everything we saw and heard was carefully scripted and rehearsed – with the astronauts even using cue cards to describe their impressions of the distant Earth and the surface of the Moon! Apparently NASA was frightened that something might accidentally be revealed to the millions of viewers.

http://paranormalium.org/index.php/conspiracy-articles/166-video-photo-this-is-why-we-never-went-back-to-the-moon

A Stereoscopic method of verifying Apollo lunar surface images
by OLEG OLEYNIK, Ph.D.c 
Previously of the Department of Physics and Technology
Kharkov State University, Ukraine

The Apollo 15 crew comprised:

• Commander David R. Scott (Dave)
• Command Module Pilot Alfred M. Worden
• Lunar Module Pilot James B. Irwin (Jim)

Fig. 5. Topographic map of the Apollo 15 landing site.

A series of Apollo 15 photographs will be considered and stereoscopic parallax or apparent change in the relative positions of objects will be analysed.

The first series. Astronaut Dave takes a few panorama images in EVA-1 near the LM, AS15-86-11601 andAS15-86-11602.

Fig. 6. The LM with Jim standing at the rear of the rover; the Apennine front and the crater St. George are located in the background. The distance from the camera to the lunar module and rover is about 10 metres, and the Apennines and the crater should be 4-8 kms away. 

A rectangle marks the sections of the photographs which were deducted for parallax examination and separation of 3D objects from any 2D objects.

Fig. 7. The subtraction of the two photos after the transformations of scaling, rotation, and distortion is shown on the left. The right image shows the parallax achieved after merging the two frames.

Nearby objects: the LM, the rover, and astronaut Jim are shifting relative to each other. The Apennines and the crater St. George are also moving as a whole. (Moreover, the shadow is changing on the mountains and the crater.) This finding indicates that it is less than 300 metres to the background (the ‘mountains’) instead of 5 kilometres!

Therefore, with such a small alteration to the camera position in Dave's hands (several tens of centimetres), the mountains should not move, they should remain static (zero parallax).

In addition, the Apollo 15 stereoscopic photos feature a clear separation line between the ‘mountains’ and the foreground. Based on the distance between the camera and rover, the distance to the panorama of the ‘lunar’ scape cannot be more than 150 metres. 

Conclusion: It is very probable that these images were taken on Earth in a studio stage.

The second series. Jim is doing some panoramic photography (Fig. 8). The distance from his camera to the LM is approximately 40 m. Jim's ALSEP Pan at the end of EVA-2.

Fig. 8. On the left Dave collects samples; Mount Hadley; LM in the centre; behind the LM the sun is shining into the camera and the Apennines are in the distance – over 35 kms; the Apennines and the crater St. George are on the right at a distance of 5-8 kms.

The two images with a view of Mount Hadley were selected from the Panorama (distance is about 30 kms, the height more than 2.5 kms) AS15-87-11849 and AS15-87-11850.

Fig. 9. Note the numerous boot prints left by Dave and Jim.

Rectangles highlight the selected areas selected for parallax examination.

Fig. 10. The subtraction of two images after scaling, rotation, and distortion is shown on the left. The stereoscopic image after merging two images is on the right. 

Despite a slight offset of the camera, the mountains are moving, which contradicts the condition of distant mountains. If the image subtraction criteria are changed, the most darkened background condition is replaced with the most darkened front area.
 

Fig. 11. The subtraction of the front parts of the two images is on the left. The parallax resulting from the two merged images is on the right. This image was obtained by the subtraction of two photos taken with a camera shift of not more than 20 cms. Transformations of scale, rotation, reverse distortion, perspective, shift and the convergence of the two images into a stereoscopic image were applied.

An error estimate is now performed. Assuming that this is a real lunarscape, then the distance from the astronauts to the lunar horizon should be 1.5 kms and the distance to the objects in the background, such as the foot and summit of Mount Hadley, is 20-35 kms.

The offset of 100 sampled pixels below the horizon is calculated – the AB line, obtaining an average shift ± a pixels (depending on the image resolution). The shift magnitude obeys Gaussian distribution, meaning this is noise.

A sample of 50 points is selected above the line (AB), i.e. objects located at a distance of 20-35 kms. Giving an offset value of (10-50)a pixels. The shift direction has a vector and is not subject to Gaussian distribution. Moreover, the higher a dot the greater value of the shift – at the foot it is 10a, at the top 50a pixels.

It is logical to assume that if any lunar objects at the interval [0.01; 1.5] kms are static, the noise amounts to ± a, the parallax is zero, then for more distant objects at the interval [20; 35] kms, the parallax is likewise zero with the same value of noise, i.e. the shift is ± a pixels and the shift value obeys a Gaussian distribution.

However, the results indicate otherwise. Objects above the (AB) line are moving synchronously with increase in shift depending on the height above the horizon.

Conclusion: Mount Hadley moves and ‘bows’. The wrong initial assumption was probably made that this is a real lunarscape. As this research demonstrates, this setting must be a totally artificial panorama, several tens of metres in depth with a mock ‘Hadley’ in the background, moving horizontally and vertically to create an illusionof remoteness and of perspective.

A series of Apollo 15 images are now examined near Rima Hadley for the presence of stereoscopic parallax. Rima Hadley measures in length at least 135 kms, with an average width ~1.2 and average depth ~370 m (from Greeley 1971 – quoted in F. Leverington, 2008).

The third series. Dave and Jim make a few trips in the rover to Rima Hadley (Fig. 12) to collect samples. One of the panoramas comprises photos from AS15-82-11165 to AS15-84-11284.

Fig. 12. Jim is holding the camera. Rima Hadley is in the foreground. Dave is collecting samples near the rover. Mount Hadley is in the background. The sun is shining into the camera in the centre. The Apennines are over 35 kms away. Apennines Front and the crater St. George are on the left. 
(Panorama assembled by the author)

In two panorama frames is the bottom of Rima Hadley, which extends to Apennines Front and the crater St. George. The distance from the camera to Rima edge is about 5 m, to the Apennines and the crater is 4-8 kms. The frames are taken with a shift of no more than a few tens of centimetres. AS15-82-11178 and AS15-82-11179.

Fig. 13. The view of Rima Hadley, Apennines Front and the crater St. George.
Rectangles mark the sections used for parallax examination.

Fig. 14. The foreground subtraction of the two images after scaling, rotation, distortion, shift and perspective is on the left. On the right is the resulting parallax obtained after merging the two frames.

It is possible to see the movement of the surface areas relative to each other along the edge of the trench between points A and B. This situation cannot occur in real world photography. 

Conclusion: These images were probably taken on Earth in a dome-shaped studio location where movable panorama backgrounds were installed, and even treated afterwards by further adjustment in a photographic lab.

Fig. 15. Landscape and Traverse map of Apollo 15 landing site by NASA artist (showing stations 1-14).

http://www.aulis.com/stereoparallax.htm

How the "Holocaust" was faked.....by the Khazar Zionist Banksters KZB.

Thursday, March 27, 2014

The alleged "Holocaust" of "6 million Jews" at the hands of Adolf Hitler and National Socialist Germany during WWII is the biggest lie ever foisted upon humanity. The very idea that the Germans organized and executed a complex conspiracy involving "homicidal gas chambers" and other barbaric, sadistic forms of mass murder designed to exterminate European Jewry during WWII is laughable on its face when you stop and objectively think about it.

National Socialist Germany and her allies were fighting a multi-front war against some of the most powerful nations in the world at the time, including the United States, the British Empire, and the Soviet Union. The idea that they would divert their precious and extremely scarce resources and manpower towards implementing a systematic campaign of mass murder specifically designed to annihilate European Jewry is absurd.

There was no German conspiracy to systematically genocide and destroy European Jewry during WWII. There were no "homicidal gas chambers" utilized to murder Jews and other "undesirables". The system of concentration camps throughout much of Europe developed and administered by the Germans and their allies during WWII was simply a network of labor, transit, industrial and detention facilities - not "death camps". Jews, political prisoners and Communist subversives (many of whom were in fact Jewish), homosexuals and many others were detained and either put to work or imprisoned in German-administered concentration camps and industrial facilities throughout Europe.

These forced laborers and prisoners were well-cared for, at least until the end of the war when Germany's supply lines broke down and chaos ensued as a result of the Soviet and Anglo-American invasion of German territory. They were well-fed, well-provided for, and given medical treatment and entertainment. They were allowed to attend concerts, organize plays, make music and play sports. If the Germans were hell bent on murdering these people, why would they provide medical care for them and allow them to entertain themselves?

The entire WWII narrative, especially the fake "Holocaust" story, is basically the exact opposite from what we've been told and taught.

The Jewish Bolshevik terrorists who overthrew the Russian monarchy during WWI and their allies - the USA and the UK, primarily - committed the real atrocities and genocides against the German people and their sympathizers during and after WWII. The British and Americans engaged in a systematic fire-bombing campaign specifically targeting German industrial and urban areas for destruction. Major cities all throughout Germany were fire-bombed on a regular basis, resulting in the horrific death for millions of innocent German civilians - men, women and children.

The Allies sunk German civilian ships escaping the rampaging Soviet Red Army towards the end of the war, ending the lives of countless innocent civilians including, ironically enough, many Eastern European Jews fleeing from the advancing Red Army. The barbaric, out-of-control Red Army was encouraged to rape, pillage, torture and murder Germans as they advanced into German territory, and they did. Hundreds of thousands of German POWs and civilians were starved and murdered after the war, often suffering gruesome deaths from exposure, thirst and torture at the hands of the victorious and ruthless Allies. The National Socialist political, cultural and educational establishment was systematically dismantled and destroyed, with many top officials and leaders murdered, tortured, robbed, imprisoned and otherwise mistreated.

Jewish propagandists have entirely reversed the reality of the situation using their control of the media, and have blamed the Germans for starting the war and committing all the alleged atrocities, when in reality the Germans and their allies were the most disciplined, honorable and righteous forces fighting in that fratricidal Jewish-instigated war. The German people and their allies were the ones who experienced a genuine holocaust - a real genocide - during WWII, not the Jewish population of Europe.

The simple fact of the matter is that the "Holocaust" narrative - 6 million Jews persecuted, abused, and systematically exterminated by "those evil Nazis" during WWII - endlessly promoted and perpetuated by the Jewish-owned mass media, Hollywood and "entertainment" complex, and educational and political establishment is 100% bogus in virtually all respects. The Germans simply wanted the Jews out of Germany, clearly and correctly recognizing them as an alien, hostile and treacherous force working to subvert, pollute and destroy the German nation and Western civilization.

Jews were encouraged to leave Germany, and many did. Others were imprisoned or detained in the various labor and concentration camps established and administered by National Socialist Germany, and were well provided for. They were certainly not killed using "homicidal gas chambers" and other sadistic forms of murder in a systematic campaign to eliminate European Jewry.

But how exactly was such a monstrous hoax manufactured and presented to the public as if it actually happened? What follows is a brief overview identifying the primary means in which the alleged Jewish "Holocaust" during WWII was faked and sold to the public as if it were a genuine aspect of our collective history in order to advance certain geopolitical, cultural and economic agendas.

http://www.therealistreport.com/2014/03/how-holocaust-was-faked.html

Best candidate to Replace Najib? What about Anwar Ibrahim?

SAVE MALAYSIA

Written by Zaid Ibrahim

http://www.zaid.my/current/save-malaysia/
UMNO president and Prime Minister Dato’ Seri Najib Razak is about to be replaced by his enemies in the party.

Whilst spending my weekend in a small Japanese village near Tomakomai in Hokkaido, Japan, I received a call from an UMNO source that Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin was meeting UMNO bigwigs including Tun Daim Zainuddin, Dato’ Seri Nazri Aziz and Dato’ Sri Mustapa Mohamed in Italy to discuss handing over the premiership to Muhyiddin.

I don’t know if this meeting will ultimately result in Najib being replaced, but I just don’t approve of this kind of surreptitious move to replace elected leaders. I don’t know how reliable my source is, but I hope this is not part of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s plan to change the leadership.

The Prime Minister should be replaced only by a recognised and legitimate process as is usual in a parliamentary democracy. Either there is a change of party leadership, and hence the premiership, or there is a vote of no confidence in Parliament against the Prime Minister. There is no other legitimate way.

I believe that there must be a debate in Parliament about the Prime Minister. If there has been any misconduct or misfeasance in his handling of the 1MDB affair, then let the accusers put forward their arguments in the Dewan Rakyat and allow Members and, through them, the Rakyat to consider the matter before putting it to a vote. A secret meeting in Milan is not the democratic way.

Even without such shenanigans, Malaysia is in deep distress because we have leaders who are corrupt. Corruption is the biggest problem we face, and there seems to be no one out there who is willing to help weed out the problem

Stop defending corruption

Dato’ Seri Nazri Aziz

1MDB is a case in point. The crazy thing is that the Prime Minister’s “boys” are defending allegations against him by saying that during Dr Mahathir’s days, things were no different. Please spare us that nonsense. Just because corrupt practices happened before is no excuse for corruption to be accepted now.

A government-owned business can suffer losses and even huge losses, and we should not make too much fuss if it is a normal business with the usual clear and transparent accounting processes. Losing money is a risk in doing any kind of normal business—“normal” meaning that everything is done above board with no hanky-panky.

1MDB, unfortunately, is not a normal business. It has no comprehensible business plan—at least, nothing comprehensible to the Rakyat—other than acquiring public assets at huge discounts. We know that the company was able to borrow billions of ringgit and at the same time some alleged “outsiders” were able to instruct company directors to transfer vast sums to their secret accounts.

The general accusation is that, amongst other things, 1MDB is no more than a vehicle designed to siphon money from the public purse into private pockets. If this accusation is true, then the Prime Minister has been grossly negligent in his handling of the matter and should step down.

What negligence? Well, the Prime Minister did not instruct the Auditor-General to perform a forensic audit. In fact, he should have retained one of the major international auditing firms to perform an independent audit since the 1MDB controversy involves the flow of funds to and amongst many countries.

Former Prime Minister Dato’ Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi did the right thing by asking PwC to audit the Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) and it was through that investigation that the Government and the Rakyat came to know what happened (although no big fish has been convicted).

Najib’s failure to order the investigation in this case is a serious dereliction of duty that shows he is not interested in making a clean breast of what actually happened.

There are many other reasons why Najib should step down and you can write a book about them. But this is no excuse to resort to undemocratic means – however convenient they might seem – to put up a new leader.

Why? Because then there is nothing to prevent the new person from doing exactly the same thing as Najib in some other future scandal.

The replacement must be someone who is fundamentally different from the present crop of leaders in terms of integrity and honesty, otherwise we might as well keep Najib on the throne.

Najib's replacement must have the courage and will to reform Umno

Mustapa Mohamed (first left)

UMNO and the Barisan Nasional have failed to tell us what criteria they are looking for in the new leader. As far as we are concerned, it’s just a case of musical chairs and the new leader will then have to pay off whatever “political debts” are owed by stealing an even larger portion of the national pie.

This, the people do not want. It’s time the Rakyat made known their distaste for corrupt leaders.

There are many reasons why Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah should be our Prime Minister, and you can also write a book about them too. The most important reason for me is that I believe he is an honest leader. He is not corrupt and he will stem systemic corruption in the country. No one currently in the top echelon of UMNO even comes close to him.

They tried to connect him to the Carrian-Bank Bumiputra scandal of the late 1980s but he succeeded in clearing his name in the London courts. No other UMNO leader has been brave enough to clear his or her name in courts outside Malaysia.

The Malays, for their part, will want a Malay leader who protects their privileges. Muslims will want a leader who protects Islam. Non-Malays will want a leader who protects their business interests as well as their culture and education.

But no one will get what they want if leaders are corrupt. Corruption destroys everything. Malaysia will not progress. No transformation will succeed, regardless of what Dato’ Sri Idris Jala tries to tell you, unless corruption is curbed.

To clean up the country and to have enough money to care for the people, public institutions including the police must be cleansed of corruption. We have so many large scale rip-offs involving Government funds that it is no longer a laughing matter.

Let me quickly remind you of some of them since the 1980s: in 1983 the Bank Bumiputra scandal involved more than US$1 billion filling the pockets of high public officials. The Perwaja Steel scandal involved US$800 million although the protagonist, the late Tan Sri Eric Chia, was acquitted.

In 2005, Bank Islam reported a loss of close to RM500 million and ran up more than RM2.2 billion in non-performing loans due to poor management. Then we have the MAS saga where the airline lost millions of ringgit because political appointees kept getting sweetheart contracts. We also had the RM12 billion PKFZ scam, and to this day PKFZ is still trying to make a viable business out of itself.

Time magazine quoted Morgan Stanley economists saying that Malaysia lost more than US$100 billion due to corruption – excluding 1MDB – and for this reason, the people need a leader who is committed to making the fight against corruption a central policy of the Government.

I am not talking about feel-good statements about transparency, open tenders, good governance, ethical administration and all that nonsense we keep hearing from Najib.

I am talking about a leader who is willing (I believe) to limit the operation of the Official Secrets Acts to matters of state security; who will not tolerate corruption in the civil service; and who will not allow contracts for cronies.

Ku Li the better option than Muhyiddin

Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah

Anyway, Tengku Razaleigh will not jail you for sedition if you ask questions and protest peacefully about the GST. In fact, I believe he will compel members of the Cabinet, including himself, to disclose their wealth to the public.

We won’t find any other leader alive today who is willing to do this. Is there anyone in the top hierarchy of UMNO who can commit to fighting corruption all the way? Is there anyone in UMNO or the Barisan Nasional who will start open tenders again for big projects? There is no one.

So let’s get this country moving again. I urge Dr Mahathir to support a movement for Tengku Razaleigh to be made Prime Minister. If he were to do this, Dr Mahathir will always be remembered for saving this country.

Tengku Razaleigh represents our last chance of restoring democracy and to bring back the visions of Tunku Abdul Rahman of a united, free and peaceful Malaysia—and also to save Dr Mahathir’s Vision 2020.

I urge the Opposition to be united in supporting Tengku Razaleigh as Prime Minister although they naturally want one of their own leaders to be Prime Minister.

This can only be achieved by a general election, so let Tengku Razaleigh set the foundation for a clean election, for deep reforms in public institutions and bring back the climate of togetherness in our country.

Let a neutral leader like him set the framework for a good government. Then, the party that has the largest number of seats can pick their own candidate for Prime Minister.

Everybody wants to be Prime Minister but let’s remember one thing: the leader who is only interested in using the country’s wealth to benefit his family or to protect himself is useless to us.

It’s about time we found a leader who will put the country first.

It’s hard to find such a leader but I believe Tengku Razaleigh is close to that ideal choice. He is with UMNO but not tainted as others are. The moment to demand a clean leader is now.

Let’s start by telling our leaders that honesty and integrity are important factors in the next Prime Minister of Malaysia. It’s hard to imagine; but we will never be a world-class country if the Prime Minister, once selected, can to plunder the nation’s wealth with impunity. - Zaid.my

Full article: http://www.malaysia-chronicle.com/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=509421:milan-coup-plot-to-replace-najib-muhyiddin-mustapa-mohamed-nazri-aziz-daim-accused-of-secret-alliance&Itemid=2#ixzz3ZnKzGory
Follow us: @MsiaChronicle on Twitter